Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91196@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Monday 14 August 2017 02:20 PM, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote: >> >> On Wednesday 09 August 2017 12:03 AM, Martin Ågren wrote: >>> >>> Maybe the final note could be removed? Someone who is looking up >>> --set-upstream because Git just "crashed" on them will only want to know >>> what they should do instead. Our thoughts about the future are perhaps >>> not that interesting. >> >> I thought it's better to document it to avoid people from getting > surprised >> when the options *starts working* again. > > I hope that explains the reason. That is something we can say we _actually_ repurpose the option. Until then, it is merely noise that distracts the users.
