Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] commit: rewrite read_graft_line

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Understood :) - yes, oid_array is not completely necessary here - and it
gives the wrong impression about usage of this struct.

FLEX_ARRAY will be brought back in v3.

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Patryk Obara <patryk.obara@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> The previous implementation of read_graft_line used calculations based
>> on GIT_SHA1_RAWSZ and GIT_SHA1_HEXSZ to determine the number of commit
>> ids in a single graft line.  New implementation does not depend on these
>> constants, so it adapts to any object_id buffer size.
>>
>> To make this possible, FLEX_ARRAY of object_id in struct was replaced
>> by an oid_array.
>
> There is a leap in logic between the two paragraphs.  Your use of
> parse_oid_hex() is good.  But I do not think moving the array body
> to outside commit_graft structure and forcing it to be separately
> allocated is necessary or beneficial.  When we got a single line, we
> know how many fake parents a child described by that graft line has,
> and you can still use of FLEX_ARRAY to avoid separate allocation
> and need for separate freeing of it.



-- 
| ← Ceci n'est pas une pipe
Patryk Obara




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux