Anthony Sottile <asottile@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Ah yes, I didn't intend to include the first hunk (forgot to amend it > out when formatting the patch). > > I think git's exit codes for -L actually make more sense than the GNU > exit codes (especially when comparing with `grep` vs `grep -v`) -- > that is, produce `0` when the search is successful (producing > *something* on stdout) and `1` when the search fails. > > Shall I create a new mail with the adjusted patch as suggested above? I do not mind seeing an updated patch that does not change the exit status (as you seem to like what we have currently that contradicts what GNU grep does) but makes it consistent between "--quiet" and "--no-quiet". But I would not be surprised if people seeing this exchange from the sideline are already working on fixing the exit status and also making sure that the fixed code would produce the same corrected exit status with or without "--quiet", so an updated patch from you will likely conflict with their effort. So if I were you, I'd wait to see what other people would say about the actual exit codes we give when "git grep -L" is run without the "--quiet" option, and if they are also happy with the current exit code, then send in an updated patch. Thanks.
