On Friday 2007 May 18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Why is that? Content is what is important. URLs are only a convenience > measure to help clients find the content. The link must have a commit > hash, so git can *verify* that the content is correct. Where it comes from > must be irrelevant. > > So if someone looks at my tree, and does not know where to get the content, > he might want my hint on this. True. Hannes also pointed out that the trust comes from the hash contained in the gitlink that is in tree, there is no need to assign trust to the URL. I withdraw my objection. Andy -- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
