Re: [PATCH 1/9] Convert pack-objects to size_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 14/08/17 21:32, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> In general, yes.
> I had a patch that allowed a 32 bit linux to commit a file >4GB.
> There is however a restriction: The file must not yet be known to the
> index. Otherwise the "diff" machinery kicks in, and tries to
> compare the "old" and the "new" versions, which means that -both-
> must fit into "memory" at the same time. Memory means here the available
> address space rather then real memory.
> So there may be room for improvements for 32 bit systems, but that is another
> story, which can be developped independent of the ulong->size_t conversion.

Oh, I absolutely agree.

> Thanks to Martin for working on this.

Indeed! Thanks Martin.

ATB,
Ramsay Jones





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux