Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] submodule: don't use submodule_from_name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 02:53:11PM -0700, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On 08/03, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > The function 'submodule_from_name()' is being used incorrectly here as a
> > > submodule path is being used instead of a submodule name.  Since the
> > > correct function to use with a path to a submodule is already being used
> > > ('submodule_from_path()') let's remove the call to
> > > 'submodule_from_name()'.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > In case a reroll is needed, you could incorperate Jens feedback
> > stating that 851e18c385 should have done it.
> 
> K I'll add that into the commit message.

Well, thats not 100% correct... IMO, it should have been a follow up patch
which I never got to implement. See my other reply to the v1 of this
patch I just sent out.

As stated there I will have a look into where it makes sense to pass a
commit id and behave more correctly.

Cheers Heiko



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux