Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:28:52AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > >> > +test_expect_success 'only trailers' ' >> > + git config trailer.sign.command "echo config-value" && >> >> You may want to use 'test_config' here, which keeps the config >> only for one test. The subsequent tests seem to overwrite the >> config, so this is not wrong, just not the best style. > > Yeah, I actually considered that but decided to keep style with the rest > of the script. I agree the whole thing could possibly switch to > test_config, but I suspect there may be some fallouts (the style of the > rest of the script seems to assume some continuity between the tests). I agree with your judgment here. As you said in the "use tool to enforce consistent style" thread, sometimes humans need to apply better taste than mechanical tooling could, and I view this one of a good example. Even though this is not a C coding-style thing, but the essense of the problem is the same. That is one of the reasons why I earlier said that we may see more style-only critique to patches if we introduce a new tool without setting the expectation of what we want to get out of such a tool straight.
