On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:36:24 -0700 > Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> There are also packed refs, so one could (like I did) think that >> pack.c is for generic packing of things, maybe packfile.c >> would be more clear? > > Good point. I'll use packfile.c and packfile.h in the next version. It looks like you used "packfile.c" and "pack.h" in v2. Is there a reason why it's not using "packfile.h"?
