Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] An attempt to move packfile funcs to its own file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> What do you mean by "keep the exposed surface area small enough"? If you
> mean the total number of exposed functions in sha1_file and pack (once
> everything is done), I think it will be almost the same as that
> currently in sha1_file.
> ...
> During this patch set, there might be some functions that need to be
> temporarily made global, but those are reverted to static in the end.

That is exactly what I meant.

> As stated above, I don't think so, but I'll make a list of the functions
> needing to be made global.

Good.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux