Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > What do you mean by "keep the exposed surface area small enough"? If you > mean the total number of exposed functions in sha1_file and pack (once > everything is done), I think it will be almost the same as that > currently in sha1_file. > ... > During this patch set, there might be some functions that need to be > temporarily made global, but those are reverted to static in the end. That is exactly what I meant. > As stated above, I don't think so, but I'll make a list of the functions > needing to be made global. Good. Thanks.
