On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 6th iteration of the reftable storage format. >> >> You can read a rendered version of this here: >> https://googlers.googlesource.com/sop/jgit/+/reftable/Documentation/technical/reftable.md >> >> The index may be organized into a multi-level index, where ... >> which may in turn point to either index blocks (3rd level) or ref blocks (leaf level). > > So we allow 3 levels at most? No, its just an example. Large ref sets with small block size need 4 levels. Or more. > The file format structure marks the indexes '?', should that be > rather '*' to indicate there can be more than one index block? Will fix in the next respin of the document, thanks.
