Michael Forney <mforney@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > However, I still think the patch should be applied for > self-consistency at least (git-submodule.sh currently calls both `git > rev-parse` and `git-rev-parse`). Oh, there is no question about the changes in the patch being good, as I already said. We want to make sure that people who copy & paste code would see fewer instances of "git-foo". I was commenting on the justification in your proposed log message, which I realized was a bit misleading, after deciding that the patch text itself is good and I need to apply it. Thanks for the clean-up.
