Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Change an argument to test_line_count (which'll ultimately be turned
> into a "test" expression) to use "-gt" instead of ">" for an
> arithmetic test.
>
> This broken on e.g. OpenBSD as of v2.13.0 with my commit
> ac3f5a3468 ("ref-filter: add --no-contains option to
> tag/branch/for-each-ref", 2017-03-24).
>
> Upstream just worked around it by patching git and didn't tell us
I'm tempted to do s/Upstream/Downstream/ while queuing, but please
tell me I am confused.
> about it, I discovered this when reading various Git packaging
> implementations: https://github.com/openbsd/ports/commit/7e48bf88a20
>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> David, it would be great to get a quick bug report to
> git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx if you end up having to monkeypatch something
> we've done. We won't bite, promise :)
>
> As shown in that linked Github commit OpenBSD has another recent
> workaround in turning on DIR_HAS_BSD_GROUP_SEMANTICS and skipping a
> related test, maybe René can make more sense of that?
>
> There's more patches in their ports which indicate possible bugs of
> ours: https://github.com/openbsd/ports/tree/master/devel/git/patches/
>
> t/t7004-tag.sh | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t7004-tag.sh b/t/t7004-tag.sh
> index 0ef7b94394..0e2e57aa3d 100755
> --- a/t/t7004-tag.sh
> +++ b/t/t7004-tag.sh
> @@ -1887,7 +1887,7 @@ EOF"
> run_with_limited_stack git tag --contains HEAD >actual &&
> test_cmp expect actual &&
> run_with_limited_stack git tag --no-contains HEAD >actual &&
> - test_line_count ">" 10 actual
> + test_line_count "-gt" 10 actual
> '
>
> test_expect_success '--format should list tags as per format given' '
