Le 07/08/2017 à 18:30, Martin Ågren a écrit :
> On 7 August 2017 at 16:03, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin
> <nicolas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin <nicolas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> imap-send.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/imap-send.c b/imap-send.c
>> index b2d0b849b..38b3c817e 100644
>> --- a/imap-send.c
>> +++ b/imap-send.c
>> @@ -926,6 +926,29 @@ static int auth_cram_md5(struct imap_store *ctx, struct imap_cmd *cmd, const cha
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static void server_fill_credential(struct imap_server_conf *srvc)
>> +{
>> + struct credential cred = CREDENTIAL_INIT;
>> +
>> + if (srvc->user && srvc->pass)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + cred.protocol = xstrdup(srvc->use_ssl ? "imaps" : "imap");
>> + cred.host = xstrdup(srvc->host);
>> +
>> + cred.username = xstrdup_or_null(srvc->user);
>> + cred.password = xstrdup_or_null(srvc->pass);
>> +
>> + credential_fill(&cred);
>> +
>> + if (!srvc->user)
>> + srvc->user = xstrdup(cred.username);
>> + if (!srvc->pass)
>> + srvc->pass = xstrdup(cred.password);
>> +
>> + credential_clear(&cred);
>> +}
>> +
>> static struct imap_store *imap_open_store(struct imap_server_conf *srvc, char *folder)
>> {
>> struct credential cred = CREDENTIAL_INIT;
>> @@ -1078,20 +1101,7 @@ static struct imap_store *imap_open_store(struct imap_server_conf *srvc, char *f
>> }
>> #endif
>> imap_info("Logging in...\n");
>> - if (!srvc->user || !srvc->pass) {
>> - cred.protocol = xstrdup(srvc->use_ssl ? "imaps" : "imap");
>> - cred.host = xstrdup(srvc->host);
>> -
>> - cred.username = xstrdup_or_null(srvc->user);
>> - cred.password = xstrdup_or_null(srvc->pass);
>> -
>> - credential_fill(&cred);
>> -
>> - if (!srvc->user)
>> - srvc->user = xstrdup(cred.username);
>> - if (!srvc->pass)
>> - srvc->pass = xstrdup(cred.password);
>> - }
>> + server_fill_credential(srvc);
>>
>> if (srvc->auth_method) {
>> struct imap_cmd_cb cb;
> "cred.username" is checked further down, but now it will always be NULL,
> no?
You're right I missed this.
Not sure if this is needed though.
>From what I understand this means the username/password are store for the next access to credential. but in the current state, there is only one.
Maybe the credential_approved can be dropped ?
Nicolas
