On 4 August 2017 at 18:00, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Since this is my first code contribution to Git, I'll ask about this part of >> SubmittingPatches: >> >> "After the list reached a consensus that it is a good idea to apply the >> patch, re-send it with "To:" set to the maintainer [*1*] and "cc:" the >> list [*2*] for inclusion." >> >> I will boldly assume that I should not be doing this. It seems to me this >> doesn't happen very often or not at all -- possibly because you tend to >> be involved in virtually all threads anyway, before the list reaches a >> consensus. > > Yeah, that is in the "ideal patch flow" section, isn't it? Yes and no. It's in the main part above it, under "(4) Sending your patches." But you are right that the ideal patch flow section then says the same thing: "(4) The list forms consensus that the last round of your patch is good. Send it to the maintainer and cc the list." > We > rarely achieve the "ideal" and often instead go for a more expedited > option, it appears---perhaps I should try to be less involved in > individual patch reviews and place more review burden on other > reviewers ;-) :-)
