Re: [PATCH] Move refspec pattern matching to match_refs().

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This means that send-pack and http-push will support pattern refspecs,
> so builtin-push.c doesn't have to expand them, and also git push can
> just turn --tags into "refs/tags/*", further simplifying builtin-push.c

Nice.

> @@ -266,5 +174,8 @@ int cmd_push(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  		usage(push_usage);
>  	}
>  	set_refspecs(argv + i, argc - i);
> +	if (all && refspec)
> +		usage(push_usage);
> +
>  	return do_push(repo);
>  }

Is this hunk an independent bugfix?  I think send-pack has its
own check but I guess http-push lacked its own check?

> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
> index 2ae3235..cd63f37 100644
> --- a/refs.c
> +++ b/refs.c
> @@ -603,15 +603,18 @@ int get_ref_sha1(const char *ref, unsigned char *sha1)
>  
>  static inline int bad_ref_char(int ch)
>  {
> -	return (((unsigned) ch) <= ' ' ||
> -		ch == '~' || ch == '^' || ch == ':' ||
> -		/* 2.13 Pattern Matching Notation */
> -		ch == '?' || ch == '*' || ch == '[');
> +	if (((unsigned) ch) <= ' ' ||
> +	    ch == '~' || ch == '^' || ch == ':')
> +		return 1;
> +	/* 2.13 Pattern Matching Notation */
> +	if (ch == '?' || ch == '*' || ch == '[')
> +		return 2;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  int check_ref_format(const char *ref)
>  {
> -	int ch, level;
> +	int ch, level, bad_type;
>  	const char *cp = ref;
>  
>  	level = 0;
> @@ -622,13 +625,19 @@ int check_ref_format(const char *ref)
>  			return -1; /* should not end with slashes */
>  
>  		/* we are at the beginning of the path component */
> -		if (ch == '.' || bad_ref_char(ch))
> +		if (ch == '.')
>  			return -1;
> +		bad_type = bad_ref_char(ch);
> +		if (bad_type) {
> +			return (bad_type == 2 && !*cp) ? -3 : -1;
> +		}
>  
>  		/* scan the rest of the path component */
>  		while ((ch = *cp++) != 0) {
> -			if (bad_ref_char(ch))
> -				return -1;
> +			bad_type = bad_ref_char(ch);
> +			if (bad_type) {
> +				return (bad_type == 2 && !*cp) ? -3 : -1;
> +			}
>  			if (ch == '/')
>  				break;
>  			if (ch == '.' && *cp == '.')
> diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> index 46fe8d9..05b16ad 100644
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
>...
> @@ -497,23 +501,48 @@ static struct ref *find_ref_by_name(struct ref *list, const char *name)
>...
>  int match_refs(struct ref *src, struct ref *dst, struct ref ***dst_tail,
>  	       int nr_refspec, char **refspec, int all)
>  {
>  	struct refspec *rs =
>  		parse_ref_spec(nr_refspec, (const char **) refspec);
>  
> -	if (nr_refspec)
> -		return match_explicit_refs(src, dst, dst_tail, rs, nr_refspec);
> +	if (nr_refspec) {
> +		if (match_explicit_refs(src, dst, dst_tail, rs, nr_refspec))
> +			return -1;
> +	}

Style?  "if (nr_refspec && match_explicit...)" and then you can
lose the excess braces.

>  
>  	/* pick the remainder */
>  	for ( ; src; src = src->next) {
>  		struct ref *dst_peer;
>  		if (src->peer_ref)
>  			continue;
> +		if (!check_pattern_match(rs, nr_refspec, src))
> +			continue;
> +
>  		dst_peer = find_ref_by_name(dst, src->name);
> -		if ((dst_peer && dst_peer->peer_ref) || (!dst_peer && !all))
> +		if (dst_peer && dst_peer->peer_ref) {
> +			/* We're already sending something to this ref. */
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +		if (!dst_peer && !nr_refspec && !all) {
> +			/* Remote doesn't have it, and we have no
> +			 * explicit pattern, and we don't have
> +			 * --all. */
>  			continue;
> +		}
>  		if (!dst_peer) {
>  			/* Create a new one and link it */
>  			int len = strlen(src->name) + 1;

Style?  Excess braces...

> diff --git a/send-pack.c b/send-pack.c
> index 59352c8..697dbbc 100644
> --- a/send-pack.c
> +++ b/send-pack.c
> @@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ static void verify_remote_names(int nr_heads, char **heads)
>  		case -2: /* ok but a single level -- that is fine for
>  			  * a match pattern.
>  			  */
> +		case -3: /* ok but ends with a pattern-match character */
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  		die("remote part of refspec is not a valid name in %s",

I am not sure what is going on here.  Your new code returns -3
when the pattern has any metacharacter at the end, and
metacharacter in the middle gives -1.  Does that mean the code
would say "alright, that is a pattern" when it sees "refs/heads/foo["?

I think we can go two ways.

 (1) Although the current code does not support it, the intent
     for the globbing refspec "refs/*:refs/remotes/origin/*" was
     to allow "refs/heads/[a-z]*:refs/remotes/origin/[a-z]*" (I
     am not sure about the RHS, but it should be clear that what
     is intended is "grab only the ones that begin with [a-z]
     and track" in that example).  If we were to eventually do
     this, I think check_ref_format() should probably be a bit
     more careful when parsing glob() patterns (e.g. matching
     bra-ket).
     
 (2) As my uncertainty about the RHS above shows, we may not
     support more general glob patterns and stay with only the
     trailing "/*".  At least that is what we have now.  Maybe
     check_ref_format should return "good but ends with meta"
     only when the refspec consists of all good ref_char
     followed by "/*" at the end.

My current preference is the latter.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux