Thanks! I'll keep this in mind next time I send a patch. Anthony On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Anthony Sottile <asottile@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> diff --git a/Documentation/diff-options.txt b/Documentation/diff-options.txt >> index 89cc0f4..43d18a4 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/diff-options.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/diff-options.txt >> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ endif::git-log[] >> the diff between the preimage and `/dev/null`. The resulting patch >> is not meant to be applied with `patch` or `git apply`; this is >> solely for people who want to just concentrate on reviewing the >> - text after the change. In addition, the output obviously lack >> + text after the change. In addition, the output obviously lacks >> enough information to apply such a patch in reverse, even manually, >> hence the name of the option. >> + > > Another thing that is more severe. You seem to have replaced all > leading tabs with whitespaces, which makes the patch unusable. For > this single character patch, I can pretend as if I applied your > patch while making the fix myself in my editor, so there is no need > to resend, but please make sure your e-mail client does not do that > the next time. > > Thanks. Queued.
