> On 21 Jul 2017, at 18:44, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> To answer your question: I don't see an easy solution to the problem. > > That's OK. Thanks for digging. > > I am wondering if the attached would be acceptable as a minimum > impact patch to address this issue. Your patch would still run a number of expensive operations for the same hashes (e.g. static analysis and documentation builds). I started to work on a patch that moves all TravisCI logic into scripts located in the `ci` folder. These scripts share a `lib-travisci.sh` for common functions such as `skip_branch_tip_with_tag ()` executed at the beginning of every script. Does this sound sensible to you? I am a bit busy with non Git related work right now but I try to post the patch for you to review ASAP. - Lars
