On 25 July 2017 at 04:11, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 02:58:38PM +1000, Andrew Ardill wrote: > >> On 24 July 2017 at 13:45, Farshid Zavareh <fhzavareh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > I'll probably test this myself, but would modifying and committing a 4GB >> > text file actually add 4GB to the repository's size? I anticipate that it >> > won't, since Git keeps track of the changes only, instead of storing a copy >> > of the whole file (whereas this is not the case with binary files, hence the >> > need for LFS). >> >> I decided to do a little test myself. I add three versions of the same >> data set (sometimes slightly different cuts of the parent data set, >> which I don't have) each between 2 and 4GB in size. >> Each time I added a new version it added ~500MB to the repository, and >> operations on the repository took 35-45 seconds to complete. >> Running `git gc` compressed the objects fairly well, saving ~400MB of >> space. I would imagine that even more space would be saved >> (proportionally) if there were a lot more similar files in the repo. > > Did you tweak core.bigfilethreshold? Git won't actually try to find > deltas on files larger than that (500MB by default). So you might be > seeing just the effects of zlib compression, and not deltas. I tweaked nothing! The space saving I assumed was pretty much just zlib compression, and I wasn't sure how much delta we actually could get, and how long that might take to run. > You can always check the delta status after a gc by running: > > git rev-list --objects --all | > git cat-file --batch-check='%(objectsize:disk) %(objectsize) %(deltabase) %(rest)' > > That should give you a sense of how much you're saving due to zlib (by > comparing the first two numbers for a copy that isn't a delta; i.e., > with an all-zeros delta base) and how much due to deltas (how much > smaller the first number is for an entry that _is_ a delta). Let's have a look: $ git rev-list --objects --all | git cat-file --batch-check='%(objectsize:disk) %(objectsize) %(deltabase) %(rest)' 174 262 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 171 260 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 139 212 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 47 36 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 377503831 2310238304 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 data.txt 47 36 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 500182546 3740427683 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 data.txt 47 36 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 447340264 3357717475 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 data.txt Yep, all zlib. What do you think is a reasonable config for storing text files this large, to get good delta compression, or is it more of a trial and error to find out what works best? Regards, Andrew Ardill
