On 5/16/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Do the indexes have enough info to use them with http ranges? It'd be > chunkier than a smart protocol, but it'd still work with dumb servers. It would not be really performant, would it? Besides, not all Web servers speak HTTP/1.1...
Performant compared to downloading a huge packfile to get 10% of it? Sure! It'd probably take a few trips, and you'd end up fetching 20% of the file, still better than 100%.
Besides, not all Web servers speak HTTP/1.1...
Are there any interesting webservers out there that don't? Hand-rolled purpose-built webservers often don't but those don't serve files, they serve web apps. When it comes to serving files, any webserver that is supported (security-wise) these days is HTTP/1.1. And for services like SF.net it'd be a safe low-cpu way of serving git files. 'cause the git protocol is quite expensive server-side (io+cpu) as we've seen with kernel.org. Being really smart with a cgi is probably going to be expensive too. cheers, m - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
