Re: MinGW port: some questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 12:09 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I do not know if you mistyped dc380d6 (I do not find it there),

I did; it was dc3806d.  I don't know how it slipped...  I usually
cut'n'paste commit IDs :-/

> but reverting 4493e36 (merge of jc/3way) was intentional.  The
> work in that commit that deviates from the mainline is the
> jc/3way topic, which turned out to be incomplete and not very
> usable.

I know it was intentional; but the revert happened on Feb 13, and the
MinGW port is supposed to be merged up to v1.5.1.  The revert of dc3806d
("in_merge_bases(): optimization") and 40e0e66 ("merge_base(): move
traversal into a separate function.") also happened on Feb 13, and both
of there commits are still present in the MinGW master branch.

Maybe I'll just try cherry-picking the port's commits on top of the
latest master, and see if anything breaks :)

	-az

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux