Re: [GSoC][PATCH 4/8] submodule: port submodule subcommand 'status' from shell to C

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>>> +       if (!lstat(list_item->name, &st) && !ce_match_stat(list_item, &st, 0)) {
>>>> +               print_status(info, ' ', list_item->name, sub_sha1, displaypath);
>>>
>>> The question from the last round still stands
>>> https://public-inbox.org/git/CAGZ79kb18z5zc9iu3Vv5aVZWJmoZzmwbMVpy89VC-t-ei2M+bw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>>
>>>   I am not an expert in the diff area  and wonder how
>>>   the cmd_diff_files functionality is achieved with just a stat call
>>>   and then comparing it to  ce_match_stat. 'Using "dirty" ignores
>>>   all changes to the work tree of submodules, only changes to the
>>>   commits stored in the superproject are shown.' So I'd have
>>>   expected ce->oid to be compared (is there an index entry differing,
>>>   i.e. more than one stage?)
>>
>> ce_match_stat() calls into ce_compare_gitlink() for a 160000 entry,
>> which would resolve HEAD ref there and compares ce->oid with it.
>
> Oh in that case this should be fine, as in the original we did
> "git diff-files --ignore-submodules=dirty <path>",
> which did precisely that.

Are you sure that this will work correctly when ce is unmerged?
run_diff_files() has quite a lot of code for that case.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux