Re: [PATCH] ls-files: don't try to prune an empty index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:11:20PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:

> Exit early when asked to prune an index that contains no
> entries to begin with.  This avoids pointer arithmetic on
> istate->cache, which is possibly NULL in that case.
> 
> Found with Clang's UBSan.

Makes sense. We could use MOVE_ARRAY() here, but this is a sensible
short-circuit to the whole function.

Looks like a good solution.

> diff --git a/builtin/ls-files.c b/builtin/ls-files.c
> index b8514a0029..adf572da68 100644
> --- a/builtin/ls-files.c
> +++ b/builtin/ls-files.c
> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static void prune_index(struct index_state *istate,
>  	int pos;
>  	unsigned int first, last;
> 
> -	if (!prefix)
> +	if (!prefix || !istate->cache_nr)
>  		return;
>  	pos = index_name_pos(istate, prefix, prefixlen);
>  	if (pos < 0)

"git am" complained that this does not apply to its blobs. Did you
hand-edit?

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux