On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 06:27:04AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 09:22:50PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote: > > > Simplify the implementation and allow callers to use expressions with > > side-effects by turning the macros get_be16, get_be32 and put_be32 into > > inline functions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> > > --- > > All these redundant casts started to bother me, so I tried to come up > > with nice and clean inline functions. Successfully? You tell me. > > They are longer, but less cluttered. Would it punish -O0 builds? Is > > it all worth it? > > I do think the end result is a lot more readable. On gcc 6 at least, the > function seems[1] to end up inlined even with -O0. For my footnote. I was just going to show the test file I compiled: #include "git-compat-util.h" uint32_t foo(const char *x) { return get_be32(x); } It's possible the optimizer may behave differently on a more complicated input, but it does show that -O0 is still willing to inline. -Peff