Miguel Torroja <miguel.torroja@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I've just sent in reply to your previous e-mail three different patches. > > * The first patch is just to show some broken tests, > * Second patch is to fix the original issue I had (the one that > initiated this thread) > * Third patch is the one that filters out "info" messages in p4CmdList > (this time default is reversed and set to False, what is the original > behaviour). The two test cases that are cured with this change have to > set explicitely skip_info=True. The approach looks reasonable. By having tests that expect failure upfront, the series clearly shows how the code changes in later steps make things better. Thanks. Will replace.
