Re: [PATCH 1/3] repo_read_index: don't discard the index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brandon Williams wrote:

> Have 'repo_read_index()' behave more like the other read_index family of
> functions and don't discard the index if it has already been populated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  repository.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

How did you discover this?  E.g. was it from code inspection or does
this make the function more convenient to use for some kinds of callers?

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux