On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 09:02:24PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote: > After a quick look at the ./t0000-basic.sh test, I managed to get > the test to complete (with 15 tests failing), with the following > patch applied: > > -- >8 -- > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 3c341b2a6..8e6433738 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ ifdef SANITIZE > BASIC_CFLAGS += -fsanitize=$(SANITIZE) -fno-sanitize-recover=$(SANITIZE) > BASIC_CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer > ifeq ($(SANITIZE),undefined) > -BASIC_CFLAGS += -DNO_UNALIGNED_LOADS > +BASIC_CFLAGS += -DNO_UNALIGNED_LOADS -DSHA1DC_FORCE_ALIGNED_ACCESS > endif > endif Thanks, I forgot to mention SHA1DC. When I had originally tested with "undefined", it was before we had SHA1DC. I hacked around it earlier today by just using OPENSSL_SHA1. ;) I agree if we can ask it to avoid unaligned access that is even better. > diff --git a/sha1dc/sha1.c b/sha1dc/sha1.c > index 25eded139..3baddc636 100644 > --- a/sha1dc/sha1.c > +++ b/sha1dc/sha1.c > @@ -118,6 +118,10 @@ > #define SHA1DC_ALLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS > #endif /*UNALIGNMENT DETECTION*/ > > +#if defined(SHA1DC_ALLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) && defined(SHA1DC_FORCE_ALIGNED_ACCESS) > +#undef SHA1DC_ALLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS > +#endif I think our current strategy is to avoid touching sha1.c as much as possible. I think we'd prefer a patch to the upstream project to support FORCE_ALIGNED_ACCESS (unfortunately I do not see a way to tweak it using only external defines. -Peff
