On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 06:46 +0200, Kevin Daudt wrote: > > The function is called "rest_is_empty". > Thanks for correcting that! > But isn't it better that commit and merge use the same code, instead > of > duplicating it again? Otherwise one may be updated, and the other > forgotten, getting differences in behaviur, which is what you want to > solve. > Yes, I did think of that. It *seems* that neither "message_is_empty" or the "rest_is_empty" are exposed to other files. Have to work on that. -- Kaartic
