> On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 10:00 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I am not so sure that we are searching for them, to be honest (who > > are we in this context anyway?) > Imagining HTML could be used in plain-text, <strike> I think I misinterpreted your sentence in one of the other mails (found below), </strike> Sorry for that sloppy sentence. More correctly, the "we" in that context is the same as the "we" in the context of the text quoted below, > That sounds like a sample that is there not because it would be > useful, but because we couldn't think of any useful example. > Link to the post that has the quoted text, http://public-inbox.org/git/%3Cxmqqy3s7nbkm.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx%3E/
