Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I think it would be good to ensure the >> interface is robust and performant enough to actually replace the current >> object store interface (even if we don't actually do that just yet). > > I agree that it should be robust and performant, but I don't think it > needs to be as performant in all cases as the current object store > right now. That sounds like starting from a defeatest position. Is there a reason why you think using an external interface could never perform well enough to be usable in everyday work?
