The commit template adds the optional parts without
a new line to distinguish them. This results in
difficulty in interpreting it's content. Add new
lines to separate the distinct parts of the template.
The warning about usage of 'explicit paths without
any corresponding options' has outlived it's purpose of
warning users about the usage '--only' as default rather
than '--include'. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91196@xxxxxxxxx>
---
builtin/commit.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c
index 8d1cac062..22d17e6f2 100644
--- a/builtin/commit.c
+++ b/builtin/commit.c
@@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ static enum commit_whence whence;
static int sequencer_in_use;
static int use_editor = 1, include_status = 1;
static int show_ignored_in_status, have_option_m;
-static const char *only_include_assumed;
static struct strbuf message = STRBUF_INIT;
static enum wt_status_format status_format = STATUS_FORMAT_UNSPECIFIED;
@@ -841,9 +840,6 @@ static int prepare_to_commit(const char *index_file, const char *prefix,
"with '%c' will be kept; you may remove them"
" yourself if you want to.\n"
"An empty message aborts the commit.\n"), comment_line_char);
- if (only_include_assumed)
- status_printf_ln(s, GIT_COLOR_NORMAL,
- "%s", only_include_assumed);
/*
* These should never fail because they come from our own
@@ -877,8 +873,7 @@ static int prepare_to_commit(const char *index_file, const char *prefix,
(int)(ci.name_end - ci.name_begin), ci.name_begin,
(int)(ci.mail_end - ci.mail_begin), ci.mail_begin);
- if (ident_shown)
- status_printf_ln(s, GIT_COLOR_NORMAL, "%s", "");
+ status_printf_ln(s, GIT_COLOR_NORMAL, "%s", ""); /* Add new line for clarity */
saved_color_setting = s->use_color;
s->use_color = 0;
@@ -1208,8 +1203,6 @@ static int parse_and_validate_options(int argc, const char *argv[],
die(_("Only one of --include/--only/--all/--interactive/--patch can be used."));
if (argc == 0 && (also || (only && !amend && !allow_empty)))
die(_("No paths with --include/--only does not make sense."));
- if (argc > 0 && !also && !only)
- only_include_assumed = _("Explicit paths specified without -i or -o; assuming --only paths...");
if (!cleanup_arg || !strcmp(cleanup_arg, "default"))
cleanup_mode = use_editor ? CLEANUP_ALL : CLEANUP_SPACE;
else if (!strcmp(cleanup_arg, "verbatim"))
--
2.11.0
