Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] fsmonitor: add test cases for fsmonitor extension

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Ben Peart <peartben@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +# fsmonitor works correctly with or without the untracked cache
> +# but if it is available, we'll turn it on to ensure we test that
> +# codepath as well.
> +
> +test_lazy_prereq UNTRACKED_CACHE '
> +       { git update-index --test-untracked-cache; ret=$?; } &&
> +       test $ret -ne 1
> +'
> +
> +if test_have_prereq UNTRACKED_CACHE; then
> +       git config core.untrackedcache true
> +else
> +       git config core.untrackedcache false
> +fi

I wonder if it would be better to just do something like:

=====================

test_expect_success 'setup' '
        ....
'

uc_values="false"
test_have_prereq UNTRACKED_CACHE && uc_values="false true"

for uc_val in $uc_values
do

    test_expect_success "setup untracked cache to $uc_val" '
         git config core.untrackedcache $uc_val
    '

    test_expect_success 'refresh_index() invalidates fsmonitor cache' '
          ...
    '

    test_expect_success "status doesn't detect unreported modifications" '
          ...
    '

...

done

=====================



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux