Re: [PATCH] xdiff: trim common tail with -U0 after diff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23.06.2017 22:39, René Scharfe wrote:

> The changed test script passes just fine for me even without your change
> to xdiff-interface.c, which is odd.

Sorry, I've apparently messed this up - it seems to be the case for me, too.

I would assume that using the functions.c context/diff in this test file might prove it, but when I wrote this test I was already unsure to base it on an experimental feature, that might just get removed again (with its tests).

> Do you have another way to demonstrate the unexpected behavior?

It was clearly reproducible with a local test case, based on "copying an existing test case, and modifying the header for it only".

Given the other replies, it seems like it is more a question now if the trimming should get moved down, or removed completely it seems.
So I will not update the patch/test for now.


-- 
http://daniel.hahler.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux