Hi Liam,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Liam Beguin wrote:
> On 14/06/17 09:08 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> > index a697906d463..a0e020dab09 100644
> > --- a/sequencer.c
> > +++ b/sequencer.c
> > @@ -2640,3 +2640,110 @@ int check_todo_list(void)
> >
> > return res;
> > }
> > +
> > +/* skip picking commits whose parents are unchanged */
> > +int skip_unnecessary_picks(void)
> > +{
> > + const char *todo_file = rebase_path_todo();
> > + struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> > + struct todo_list todo_list = TODO_LIST_INIT;
> > + struct object_id onto_oid, *oid = &onto_oid, *parent_oid;
> > + int fd, i;
> > +
> > + if (!read_oneliner(&buf, rebase_path_onto(), 0))
> > + return error(_("could not read 'onto'"));
> > + if (get_sha1(buf.buf, onto_oid.hash)) {
>
> I missed this last time but we could also replace `get_sha1` with `get_oid`
Good point!
I replaced this locally and force-pushed, but there is actually little
chance of this patch series being integrated in a form with which I would
be comfortable.
Ciao,
Dscho