Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> It is not known if a simple "yes/no" is sufficient in the longer >> term, and what should happen when --recurse-submodules option starts >> taking "recurse into them how?" parameter, though. > > Any pointers for where this has been discussed, if anywhere (e.g. was If this were discussed, then the answer to the question we may know by now ;-) I do not think anybody gave a serious thought to convince the public why a boolean is enough, hence this comment. >> * bw/config-h (2017-06-13) 4 commits >> - config: don't implicitly use gitdir >> - config: don't include config.h by default >> - config: remove git_config_iter >> - config: create config.h >> >> Code clean-up. > > Patches 1-3 are good to go IMHO. > > Patch 4 in pu is marked with my Reviewed-by. I think it's getting > there but not there yet. Did some script pull the tag from my reply > to the cover letter? No, nothing that elaborate. I go through each message in Gnus newsreader and feed the article to a shell command, e.g. "Meta/add-by -r jrnieder@ | git am -s3c". The UI remembers the last command I used when I choose to feed the next article to a shell command, and after running it to first three, I forgot to remove the 'add-by' bit from the command line for the fourth one.