On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2017-06-13 10:41 AM, Marc Branchaud wrote: >> >> >> So I like your refs/tracking proposal, and hope that it aims for mirroring >> a remote's refs, to eventually replace refs/remotes entirely. > > > To be extra-clear: > > I think a refs/tracking hierarchy that starts with notes and maybe some > other bits is a good first step. > > I *hope* such a first step can eventually mirror all of a remote's refs, > including heads and tags. > > I in no way think that this effort should begin by tackling heads and tags. > > M. > As far as I understand it, mirroring all refs should be as simple as adding something like refs/*:refs/tracking/<name>/* assuming that * begins working for multiple components.. Now actually making *use* of that feature would be different. However, this was generally the direction I was thinking of heading. Thanks, Jake