On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What is the next step, then? You can find the notion ridiculous but > it's how this project has worked in my experience (and how other > projects with similar patch-based workflows work). Does "patch-based" have much to do with this? I agree that distributed nature of the development would bring this issue, but I tend to think that using merge/pull based workflow would not alleviate it--am I mistaken?