On 06/10, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> >> - if (read_cache() < 0)
> >> + if (repo_read_index(the_repository))
> >
> > oops, looks like this should have been:
>
> Queued, with this fix-up already applied.
>
> It had a bit of conflicts with topics in flight that may added some
> more globals, so please make sure that the conflict resolution is
> sane (i.e. do not look only at bw/repo-object and be happy; rather,
> please check "pu^{/^Merge branch 'bw/repo-object' into pu}".
>
> Thanks.
Thanks for picking this up and merging it to pu. After some discussion
I think it may be ideal to split this thing up so that the parts that
aren't specific to the 'repository object' can be reviewed more easily
as a 32 long patch set can be daunting to review. I also need to think
a little bit more about the breakage this series causes in pu.
--
Brandon Williams