Yann Dirson <ydirson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Side note about the "stg move" name: yes it could possible to mistake it > for "move file" (especially as we don't have "stg mv"). My current > state of mind would be to drop add/rm/cp from stgit, and move the "stg > cp" logic to a new git-cp command. This way, stgit would just be > about handling series of patches, with git being used for the > working-copy. Any opinions on this ? For this reason, and others, I think "stg reorder" would be better. Especially if you implement Karl's suggestion of reordering all patches in an editor. -- David Kågedal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
