From: "Kaartic Sivaraam" <kaarticsivaraam91196@xxxxxxxxx>
On Wednesday 07 June 2017 03:35 AM, Philip Oakley wrote:
Maybe have a try at a patch to update the text? See the
git/Documentation/SubmittingPatches for guidance.
I guess this should be trivial (correct me if I'm wrong). I'll try when I
find time. In case I make the change which of the following message should
replace the message 'Initial commit' ? (this could be a poll, I guess)
1. No commit yet
2. Waiting for initial commit
3. Your current branch does not have any commits
2, or 3, or a mix of the two "current branch waiting for initial commit"
maybe.
Further what is to be done about the following comment,
On Wednesday 07 June 2017 12:23 AM, Jeff King wrote:
There is a slight complication, though. There's similar text in "git
status -sb", which shows: ## Initial commit on master Should that also
change to use consistent terminology? If so, we need a phrasing short
phrasing that matches (and the --porcelain and --porcelain=v2 formats of
course would need to remain the same).
BTW, could anyone provide a pointer to the implementation that prints this
message ?
I think the two messages are in wt-status.c with the simple "Initial commit"
at ~L1560, while ~L1728 has the "Initial commit on" line.
Philip
--
Regards,
Kaartic Sivaraam