Re: suggestions for gitweb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Lines of code and file sizes: file size needs additional invocation
> per each file for gitweb; it would be easier for cgit. Costly! Counting
> LOC is even more costly: take note that 1.) gitweb operates directly
> on repository / object database, and does not use working area, 
> 2.) git is snapshot based and not changeset based.

We earlier discussed to make --numstat to allow us add this kind
of information for easier script consumption.

Perhaps instead of modifying --numstat, we may be better off to
add another format that can be more easily extended to support
other things, like we do for the --porcelain format out of
git-blame?  It does not have to be one line per record, like the
way --numstat was done, which was primarily in order to make it
a compact, human readable format.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux