Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I do also wonder if the two features would need to be separated for a > GVFS-style solution. If you're not just avoiding large blobs but trying > to get a narrow clone, you don't want the .git files from the > uninteresting parts of the tree. You want to get no blobs at all, and > then fault them in as they become relevant due to user action. Thanks; I didn't think of this one while reviewing the overall design, but I agree that this is something important to think about.