Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] PCRE v2, PCRE v1 JIT, log -P & fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> See <20170525200528.22037-1-avarab@xxxxxxxxx> for v3
> (https://public-inbox.org/git/20170525200528.22037-1-avarab@xxxxxxxxx/).
>
> This is on top of "[PATCH v4 00/31] Easy to review grep & pre-PCRE
> changes".
>
> Changes:
>
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason (8):
>   grep: don't redundantly compile throwaway patterns under threading
>   grep: skip pthreads overhead when using one thread
>   log: add -P as a synonym for --perl-regexp
>   grep: add support for the PCRE v1 JIT API
>   grep: un-break building with PCRE < 8.32
>   grep: un-break building with PCRE < 8.20
>
> No changes.
>
>   grep: un-break building with PCRE >= 8.32 without --enable-jit
>
> NEW: It turns out that a PCRE version that supports JIT, but is built
> without JIT support will fail at link time since there's no
> pcre_jit_exec symbol.
>
> It also turns out (contrary to what I claimed on list before, my
> mistake) that there's no way to detect this through some macro. All
> the pcre include files are the same with/without --enable-jit, only
> the object file differs.
>
> So there's now a NO_LIBPCRE1_JIT flag to the Makefile, which is off by
> default, but turned on on MinGW. I have not tested that
> config.mak.uname change, but everything else I could test on Linux.
>
> The reason for why it's NO_LIBPCRE1_JIT not USE_LIBPCRE1_JIT is that
> in practice pretty much everyone who builds pcre builds it with JIT
> (I've looked through various Linux/BSD distro build files), it's MinGW
> that's the exception here. Given the performance gain it makes sense
> to make it the default.
>
>   grep: add support for PCRE v2
>
> Almost no changes, just:
>
>  * A trivial change to stop redundantly assigning to pcre2_jit_on,
>    mistakenly left over from an earlier version.
>
>  * Updated commit message / perf numbers for the extra patches in the
>    series both here and in v3.

Nicely summarised and matches what I received; thanks, will replace.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]