Re: [WIP/RFC 00/23] repository object

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is still very much in a WIP state, though it does pass all tests.  What
> I'm hoping for here is to get a discussion started about the feasibility of a
> change like this and hopefully to get the ball rolling.  Is this a direction we
> want to move in?  Is it worth the pain?

I would be really happy to see this series land eventually.

The introduction of a repo object will deliver performance at a higher
level, such as
* (remarked by Ben): enabling of threading
* submodules do not need to spawn processes
* I would imagine that developer velocity will go up by having less global state
  in the long run.

Thanks for working on this.
Stefan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]