Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] refs: Add for_each_worktree_ref for iterating over all worktree HEADs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Simon Ruderich <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:45:31PM -0700, Manish Goregaokar wrote:
>> Hm, my invocation of git-send-email keeps getting the threading wrong.
>> Is there a recommended set of arguments to the command?
>
> The threading looks fine here (for both cases where you mentioned
> it being wrong). Why do you think it's wrong? How does it look on
> your end?

If you're on gmail (as Manish and I both are) patches in a subsequent
version will be threaded (wrongly) against "earlier" versions of the
patch. So if you have patch series A0, A1, A2, A3 and new version B0,
B1, B2, if you thread them as

A0
- A1
- A2
- A3
- B0
  - B1
  - B2

gmail will show them in your inbox as

A0
- B0

A1
- B1

A2

A3
- B2

Depending on whatever heuristics they use to match up "threads",
presumably because most emails aren't threaded correctly.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]