Re: [PATCH 07/23] ref_store: take `logmsg` parameter when deleting references

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:05:30PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:

> Just because the files backend can't retain reflogs for deleted
> references is no reason that they shouldn't be supported by the
> virtual method interface. Let's add them now before the interface
> becomes truly polymorphic and increases the work.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  builtin/fetch.c                |  2 +-
>  builtin/remote.c               |  4 ++--
>  refs.c                         | 11 ++++++-----
>  refs.h                         | 12 +++++++-----
>  refs/files-backend.c           |  4 ++--
>  refs/refs-internal.h           |  2 +-
>  t/helper/test-ref-store.c      |  3 ++-
>  t/t1405-main-ref-store.sh      |  2 +-
>  t/t1406-submodule-ref-store.sh |  2 +-
>  9 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Having carried a similar patch in GitHub's fork for many years (because
we maintain an audit log of all ref updates), I expected this to be
bigger. But I forgot that we did 755b49ae9 (delete_ref: accept a reflog
message argument, 2017-02-20) a few months ago, which already hit most
of the ref-deleting callers. This is just making the plural
delete_refs() interface match.

I think your reasoning above is sound by itself, but that gives an added
interface: we are making the delete_ref() and delete_refs() interfaces
consistent.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]