[PATCH 22/23] ref-filter: limit traversal to prefix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>

When we are matching refnames "as path" against a pattern, then we
know that the beginning of any refname that can match the pattern has
to match the part of the pattern up to the first glob character. For
example, if the pattern is `refs/heads/foo*bar`, then it can only
match a reference that has the prefix `refs/heads/foo`.

So pass that prefix to `for_each_fullref_in()`. This lets the ref code
avoid passing us the full set of refs, and in some cases avoid reading
them in the first place.

This could be generalized to the case of multiple patterns, but (a) it
probably doesn't come up that often, and (b) it is more awkward to
deal with multiple patterns (e.g., the patterns might not be
disjoint). So, since this is just an optimization, punt on the case of
multiple patterns.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 ref-filter.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
index 1fc5e9970d..54cc6bcc13 100644
--- a/ref-filter.c
+++ b/ref-filter.c
@@ -1665,6 +1665,66 @@ static int filter_pattern_match(struct ref_filter *filter, const char *refname)
 	return match_pattern(filter, refname);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Find the longest prefix of pattern we can pass to
+ * for_each_fullref_in(), namely the part of pattern preceding the
+ * first glob character.
+ */
+static void find_longest_prefix(struct strbuf *out, const char *pattern)
+{
+	const char *p;
+
+	for (p = pattern; *p && !is_glob_special(*p); p++)
+		;
+
+	strbuf_add(out, pattern, p - pattern);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This is the same as for_each_fullref_in(), but it tries to iterate
+ * only over the patterns we'll care about. Note that it _doesn't_ do a full
+ * pattern match, so the callback still has to match each ref individually.
+ */
+static int for_each_fullref_in_pattern(struct ref_filter *filter,
+				       each_ref_fn cb,
+				       void *cb_data,
+				       int broken)
+{
+	struct strbuf prefix = STRBUF_INIT;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!filter->match_as_path) {
+		/*
+		 * in this case, the patterns are applied after
+		 * prefixes like "refs/heads/" etc. are stripped off,
+		 * so we have to look at everything:
+		 */
+		return for_each_fullref_in("", cb, cb_data, broken);
+	}
+
+	if (!filter->name_patterns[0]) {
+		/* no patterns; we have to look at everything */
+		return for_each_fullref_in("", cb, cb_data, broken);
+	}
+
+	if (filter->name_patterns[1]) {
+		/*
+		 * multiple patterns; in theory this could still work as long
+		 * as the patterns are disjoint. We'd just make multiple calls
+		 * to for_each_ref(). But if they're not disjoint, we'd end up
+		 * reporting the same ref multiple times. So let's punt on that
+		 * for now.
+		 */
+		return for_each_fullref_in("", cb, cb_data, broken);
+	}
+
+	find_longest_prefix(&prefix, filter->name_patterns[0]);
+
+	ret = for_each_fullref_in(prefix.buf, cb, cb_data, broken);
+	strbuf_release(&prefix);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Given a ref (sha1, refname), check if the ref belongs to the array
  * of sha1s. If the given ref is a tag, check if the given tag points
@@ -1911,7 +1971,7 @@ int filter_refs(struct ref_array *array, struct ref_filter *filter, unsigned int
 		else if (filter->kind == FILTER_REFS_TAGS)
 			ret = for_each_fullref_in("refs/tags/", ref_filter_handler, &ref_cbdata, broken);
 		else if (filter->kind & FILTER_REFS_ALL)
-			ret = for_each_fullref_in("", ref_filter_handler, &ref_cbdata, broken);
+			ret = for_each_fullref_in_pattern(filter, ref_filter_handler, &ref_cbdata, broken);
 		if (!ret && (filter->kind & FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD))
 			head_ref(ref_filter_handler, &ref_cbdata);
 	}
-- 
2.11.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]