[PATCH 15/23] ref_update_reject_duplicates(): add a sanity check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It's pretty cheap to make sure that the caller didn't pass us an
unsorted list by accident, so do so.

Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 refs.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index ffc9bd0be5..68a0872562 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -1696,13 +1696,19 @@ int ref_update_reject_duplicates(struct string_list *refnames,
 
 	assert(err);
 
-	for (i = 1; i < n; i++)
-		if (!strcmp(refnames->items[i - 1].string, refnames->items[i].string)) {
+	for (i = 1; i < n; i++) {
+		int cmp = strcmp(refnames->items[i - 1].string,
+				 refnames->items[i].string);
+
+		if (!cmp) {
 			strbuf_addf(err,
 				    "multiple updates for ref '%s' not allowed.",
 				    refnames->items[i].string);
 			return 1;
+		} else if (cmp > 0) {
+			die("BUG: ref_update_reject_duplicates() received unsorted list");
 		}
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.11.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]