[PATCH 05/23] refs_ref_iterator_begin(): don't check prefixes redundantly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The backend already takes care of the prefix. By passing the prefix
again to `prefix_ref_iterator`, we were forcing that iterator to do
redundant prefix comparisons. So set it to the empty string.

Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 refs.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index 26d40f9927..f4a485cd8a 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -1247,7 +1247,13 @@ struct ref_iterator *refs_ref_iterator_begin(
 	struct ref_iterator *iter;
 
 	iter = refs->be->iterator_begin(refs, prefix, flags);
-	iter = prefix_ref_iterator_begin(iter, prefix, trim);
+
+	/*
+	 * `iterator_begin()` already takes care of prefix, but we
+	 * might need to do some trimming:
+	 */
+	if (trim)
+		iter = prefix_ref_iterator_begin(iter, "", trim);
 
 	return iter;
 }
-- 
2.11.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]