On 05/12, Paul Jolly wrote: > >> How can I help diagnose what's going on here? > > <snip> > > > Welp that's a pretty terrible bug which stems from > > missing a check to see if a submodule is initialized, and not explicitly > > setting GIT_DIR=.git (theres cases where we don't want this but turns > > out we probably should do that here). Let me know if this fixes the > > problem: > > That's certainly fixed the fork explosion. Indeed seems to now work as > expected from my perspective... > > And also answers the question that I was going to ask, namely whether > git ls-files --recurse-submodules should work on repos that do not contain > any submodules... to which I'd hoped the answer was "yes" (because as I > said it was a fatal error in v2.11.x, despite there being some output). The > behaviour I'm now seeing appears to affirm that, assuming it's as expected > from your perspective! Yep it should definitely work on repos with no submodules. I'll put this on my list of things to do so that I can come up with a more robust solution to the problem (with tests). > > Thanks for the quick response. Course, let me know if you find anything else! :D -- Brandon Williams