Hi, On Wed, 10 May 2017, tboegi@xxxxxx wrote: > From: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> > > The purpose of t0027 is to test all CRLF related conversions at "git checkout" > and "git add". > > Running t0027 under Git for Windows takes 3-4 minutes, so the whole script had > been marked as "EXPENSIVE". > > The source code for "Git for Windows" overrides this since 2014: > "t0027 is marked expensive, but really, for MinGW we want to run these > tests always." > > Recent "stress" tests show that t0025 if flaky, reported by Lars Schneider, > larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx > > All tests in t0025 are covered by t0027 already, so that t0025 can be retired. > t0027 takes less than 14 seconds under Linux, and 63 seconds under Mac Os X, > and this is more or less the same with a SSD or a spinning disk. > > Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> This is still formatted very awkwardly. How about this instead (I fixed the formatting, reworded a little here and there, and fixed the order of the footers)? -- snipsnap -- From: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> The purpose of t0027 is to test all CRLF related conversions at "git checkout" and "git add". Running t0027 under Git for Windows takes 3-4 minutes, so the whole script had been marked as "EXPENSIVE". However, the "Git for Windows" fork overrides this since 2014: "t0027 is marked expensive, but really, for MinGW we want to run these tests always." The test seems not to be expensive on other platforms at all: it takes less than 14 seconds under Linux, and 63 seconds under Mac Os X, and this is more or less the same with a SSD or a spinning disk. So let's drop the "EXPENSIVE" prereq. While at it, retire t0025: Recent "stress" tests show that t0025 if flaky, reported by Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx>, but all tests in t0025 are covered by t0027 already. Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>